SSP EPIC Silver Award – 2026 SSP EPIC Silver Award – 2026

Control what enters peer review. Before it costs you weeks.

EditorialPilot runs 100+ configurable checks across technical readiness, language quality and research integrity — the moment a manuscript arrives. Editors get evidence, not guesswork.

Book a platform walkthrough See the modules
Newsroom

EditorialPilot is now integrated with ScholarOne Manuscripts — via the Silverchair Relay API, screening runs the moment a manuscript is submitted.

Read the announcement →
Platform modules

100+ checks, organized into three screening pillars.

Every check is configurable by journal — thresholds, required statements and reporting guidelines are yours to set.

Learn More
02
Language quality

Readability and clarity, scored and explained

Section-level language signals route manuscripts to author revision or language support — without slowing review.

  • Grammar, clarity and structure scoring
  • Non-intrusive AI-assisted editing
  • ~98% accuracy, reproducible results
Configurable by journal

One platform.
Different editorial policies.

Share common checks across a portfolio, then tune thresholds, required statements, file rules and reporting guidelines for each title independently — no separate setup per journal.

Journal policy — Cell & Molecular Biology Editable
Ethics statement REQUIRED
Language triage threshold HIGH
Image integrity check ON
Reporting checklist CONSORT
How it works

From submission to routing decision.

Four steps, one queue — built around how journal teams actually triage.

01

Upload your manuscript

Manuscripts arrive via Editorial Manager, ScholarOne or direct upload — already in the screening queue.

02

Run the checks

100+ checks run against the journal's configured policy — technical, language and integrity, plus deeper research rigor checks where enabled.

03

Review the flags

Editors see flags, source evidence and confidence level in one queue — nothing is automated past the recommendation.

04

Upload your manuscript

Send to peer review, author query or desk decision — the routing call always sits with the editor.

Proven impact

Results editorial teams report.

0x

Journal Editorial Office productivity reported across deployments

0%

Reduction in admin costs reported across deployments

0%

Faster manuscript turnaround reported across deployments

0+

Checks per manuscript technical, language and integrity

Beyond compliance checks

Catch the gaps that surface later, during peer review.

Some issues only show up once a reviewer starts asking questions — a missing detail on how a study was run, or a method that can't be traced back to what was actually used. EditorialPilot flags these at submission, so reviewers spend less time chasing basics and more time on the science itself.

  • Flags when a study doesn't explain how it controlled for bias — things reviewers usually have to ask for separately
  • Confirms that materials, tools and resources used in the study are properly identified and traceable
  • One report for editors — readiness, integrity and research rigor shown together, not in separate tools
Study design clearly explained Pass
Bias-control steps reported Missing
Sample size justified Pass
Materials traceable to source Need review
Reporting standards met Pass
Platform integrations

Connects directly into the tools your editorial team already uses.

Some issues only show up once a reviewer starts asking questions — a missing detail on how a study was run, or a method that can't be traced back to what was actually used. EditorialPilot flags these at submission, so reviewers spend less time chasing basics and more time on the science itself.

Submission system — screening runs at point of intake

Via Silverchair Relay API — automated screening at submission

Author identity verification and disambiguation

Retraction signals surfaced during integrity screening

Image manipulation and duplication detection

Covered in detail above — rigor and reproducibility assessment

Similarity detection in the screening queue

Via Silverchair Relay API — automated screening at submission

Author identity verification and disambiguation

Responsible AI

Machine checks speed intake. Editors keep the final call.

EditorialPilot is built for explainable screening, human validation and policy control — every score comes with a reason and a route back to a person.

  • Human-in-the-loop validation for sensitive findings
  • Explainable scoring, available for editorial and audit review
  • Journal-level policies, thresholds and override rights
  • ISO 27001, ISO 9001 and GDPR-aligned operating posture
Flag source

Rule, model or integration

Logged
Reviewer action

Query, clear, escalate or override

Captured
Journal policy

Title-level configuration

Editable
Decision record

Evidence preserved for audit

Ready
Recognition

Validated by the scholarly publishing community.

ISO 27001:2013
ISO 9001:2015
SOC 2 Type II
GDPR aligned

SSP EPIC Silver Award
— 2026

Recognized by the Society for Scholarly Publishing for helping authors improve manuscript readiness through AI-powered technical, language, compliance and research integrity checks — resulting in higher-quality submissions and fewer avoidable revisions.

News and insights

What's happening at EditorialPilot.

Visit the newsroom
Beyond Integration: How ScholarOne Users Can Transform Editorial Screening with EditorialPilot
EditorialPilot

Beyond Integration: How ScholarOne Users Can Transform Editorial Screening with EditorialPilot

Read the Announcement

See how EditorialPilot handles your submission queue.

Bring a sample workflow, journal policy or intake problem. The demo can focus on your editorial office, production handoff or portfolio model.

What a session covers

  • Map checks to one journal policy you bring
  • Walk through the SciScore and ScholarOne integrations
  • Discuss governance and override configuration
Request a demo